Business Startup - Business News - Business Loans

Google Patent Unveils Link Penalties

Patents are used by companies worldwide to protect their unique systems or ideas, but the nature of them also means that companies must give out significant details about how their system works. Google is no exception to the rule, and they have registered numerous patents to protect their IP, including their PageRank technology.

The good thing for users is that we can access these patents and use their information to our advantage. In a WebmasterWorld thread, users are discussing a Google patent called Information retrieval based on historical data, which some claim reveals details on different types of linking techniques that would attract a Google penalty.

Extracts from the patent which have caused a stir are below:

…A typical, “legitimate” document attracts back links slowly. A large spike in the quantity of back links may signal a topical phenomenon (e.g., the CDC web

site may develop many links quickly after an outbreak, such as SARS), or signal attempts to spam a search engine (to obtain a higher ranking and, thus, better placement in search results) by exchanging links, purchasing links, or gaining links from documents without editorial discretion on making links.

…if the content of a document changes such that it differs significantly from the anchor text associated with its back links, then the domain associated with the document may have changed significantly (completely) from a previous incarnation. This may occur when a domain expires and a different party purchases the domain… All links and/or anchor text prior to that date may then be ignored or discounted.

From my understanding I think this extract has the following core messages:

For some webmasters, this information might be nothing new, but patents are still a good way to confirm popular theories or rumors!

Source

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)