Google Not Cheating: Knol Pages Buried Deep In Search Result Hell
One advantage Wikipedia has over Google’s Wikipedia-inspired Knol: Its entries still show up much higher in Google’s (GOOG) own search results.
This makes sense, of course — the longer-standing Wikipedia entries should have more inbound links, and ultimately a better Google rank. And Google has no incentive to juice the results to give its own product a boost — if it ever got caught, it would cause its brand irreparable harm.
How do some new knols compare to their Wikipedia counterparts? Wikipedia (SAI 25 #2) did particularly well for nouns like “lung cancer” and “sunscreen,” while Knol’s how-to articles like the much-ballyhooed “toilet clogs” and “how to backpack” don’t really have Wikipedia counterparts. Search ranking as of Thursday evening:
| Search Query | Wikipedia | Knol |
| type 1 diabetes | 2 | 30 |
| lung cancer | 2 | 60 |
| toilet clogs | – | 3 |
| tooth pain | – | 14 |
| how to backpack | – | 3 |
| osteoporosis | 3 | 383 |
| sunscreen | 1 | >500 |
| coleslaw | 2 | 46 |
| floating floors | 6 | >500 |
| glögg | 1 | 21 |
| barbecue | 1 | 37 |
| knol | 2 | 3 |
| eclipse | 5 | >500 |
Amusingly, if you search for “knol,” Wikipedia’s entry still comes up higher in Google’s search results than the Knol project homepage.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Microsoft Doesn't Want You to Read Books Anymore!
How To Successfully Joint Venture Your Online Business With Offline Businesses
8 Unusual Animals of Web Branding
7 lessons from investors' lost decade
DIY Social Network GROU.PS Adds Ranking System To Assign Privileges To Contributors
No Relief for Small Business Cardholders
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a comment